June 2 2015 – Tuesday
The day began with articles and social media quoting the
Governor’s office regarding possible state employee furloughs and Senate
leadership wanting to limit the day’s tax debate by voting to suspend the rules
and not allow the Democrats to “divide the question” during the planned tax
debate today.
Ultimately, Leadership is attempting to push a Senate tax
bill into conference committee, while the budget conference committee tee’d up the
debate on the mega-budget, House Sub for SB 112, in the House for Wednesday.
At their 1:30 p.m. session today the House adopted agree to
disagree on SB 112 – new bill brought into budget conference committee in order
to provide a Senate based vehicle for the budget. This is now the mega-budget bill. Once the Senate adopts an agree to disagree
motion on SB 112, the conference committee will be able to adopt a conference
committee report on SB 112 and move it forward for action in the House of
Representatives.
Note that 112 was formerly a bill by Committee on Veterans, Military and Homeland
Security - Expedited professional state credentialing for military service members
and nonresident military spouses. 2048 moves from Corrections and Juvenile
Justice CC to the Judiciary CC to replace 112.
At noon on Tuesday, the Budget Conference Committee created
three budget options:
SB 112 is now the mega-budget bill that had been agreed –
for the most part – early in May by the conference committee. There were also amendments made to a number
of provisos relating to subscription cuts, reading program, regents, school
block grant posting issue, pension obligation bonds, MCO insurer’s tax revenue,
capturing unspent dollars in the education block grant extraordinary needs fund,
and the fund for county reimbursements.
HB 2135 – was the mega-budget bill that passed the Senate
late March – amended to include the mega-budget as agreed early in May by the
conference committee – PLUS additional 2% executive agency cuts, but exempts
K-12, Regents, state hospitals, public safety agencies.
HB 2010 – the “nuclear option” – includes the mega-budget
bill as agreed early in May by the conference committee – PLUS additional 6%
across the board cuts – no exemptions.
By mid-afternoon, the conference committee altered the options,
with Senate Chairman Masterson moving to remove the 2% option, instead making
HB 2135 an across the board 5.7% budget cut on top of the cuts within the
mega-budget as agreed earlier. No agencies
would be exempted from these cuts. HB
2010 is apparently out of consideration for now. The rumor is that Masterson wants to run the
5.7% option in the Senate, but others disagree.
The Senate adopted a tax bill Tuesday afternoon
– Senate Sub for HB 2109.
The Senate debated tax policy for four days – in full debate
on the floor – with no success. So,
Senate Leadership brought forward a plan to move a base bill into conference.
Members adopted a controversial amendment from Senator Jacob
LaTurner, establishing a property tax lid, requires public vote to increase
property taxes by city or county. It
passed 30-10, but local governments will be very opposed.
There was extended debate on the most consequential
amendment (by Senator King). It would
not bring the fiscal note of the bill fully in line with the $400 million
revenue needed to fully fund the mega-budget as currently described in House
Sub for SB 112, but would help get a tax bill into conference. The purpose is to put a conference-able bill
into conference committee for three senators and three representatives to hash out.
King’s comprehensive amendment includes taxpayer amnesty, Christmas tree, social security
number requirement, Baumgardner Dept of Revenue amendment regarding letters to
taxpayers, repeals the alumni association exemption and maintains LaTurner’s
amendment.
The
odd part of this discussion is that the House already passed House Sub for SB
270 last week – which only included the amnesty plan – anticipated to bring in
$30 million. So, technically, there is
already a “conference-able” bill. Either
way, the conference committee would be creating a tax package that includes
provisions, such as increasing sales tax or rolling back some of the income tax
repeal for small businesses that are distasteful to numerous legislators. When voting on a conference committee report,
it is either a yes or no - there is no
longer an opportunity for amendments.
So, members of the Senate protested this direction.
The final
amendment – by Senator Francisco – reinserted the language to decrease the food
sales tax rate to 5.7%.
The
bill passed 25-13.
See similar article with bill description.